Loading...
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 and RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative scores 8.5/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
21 unique
10 in common
49 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 9.8 here versus 6.8 for RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative brings Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, Tripeptide-1, and Tripeptide-29 as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum relies on Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is a decent pick. RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative sits at the luxury level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, RANAVAT Firming Bakuchi Anti-Aging Serum with Peptides and Retinol Alternative scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.