Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 vs SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores 8.9/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 at 8.3/9.8. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
Score comparison
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIngredient face-off
15% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30
11 unique
Shared ingredients
9 in common
Only in SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
51 unique
Why SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule comes out ahead
Where SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.6 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30's 6.3. Its formula features Niacinamide, Hydrolyzed Silk, and Adenosine in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Hydrolyzed Silk, and Adenosine as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is a decent pick. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule sits at the mid-range level with a 8.9 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Our verdict
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 or SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
Based on ingredient analysis, SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
More comparisons
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.