Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 vs Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.3/9.8 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Tower 28 Beauty WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
TIEIngredient Transparency
Dr. Jart+ WINSFormulation Safety
Tower 28 Beauty WINSIngredient face-off
13% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30
15 unique
Only in Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen
34 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two spfs take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen scores 9.8 here versus 8.9 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen brings Allantoin, Bisabolol, and Ceramide Ap as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Cholesterol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes in at premium pricing with a 8.3 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 or Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen?
Based on ingredient analysis, Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
More comparisons
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.