Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.3/9.8 vs SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 at 6.4/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for hydration.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
15 unique
13 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.9 compared to SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30's 4.6. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Panthenol in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 6.3 here versus 3.0 for SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while sOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 relies on Niacinamide, Ectoin, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 sits at the mid-range level with a 6.4 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.