Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 vs Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.3/9.8 vs Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40 at 6.9/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40
Score comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Dr. Jart+ WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Jart+ WINSIngredient Transparency
Dr. Jart+ WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
25% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30
12 unique
Shared ingredients
8 in common
Only in Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40
24 unique
Why Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes out ahead
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40's 3.3. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.9 here versus 6.5 for Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40 relies on Ascorbyl Tetraisopalmitate, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate, and Sanguisorba Officinalis Root Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes in at premium pricing with a 8.3 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Our verdict
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 or Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40 share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and Shiseido Urban Environment Fresh-Moisture Sunscreen SPF 40?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
More comparisons
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.