Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 vs HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.3/9.8 vs HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ at 7.8/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Score comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
TIEIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Jart+ WINSIngredient Transparency
Dr. Jart+ WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
70% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30
6 unique
Shared ingredients
14 in common
Only in HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++
4 unique
Why Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes out ahead
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++'s 3.9. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.8 here versus 7.8 for HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while hERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ relies on Niacinamide and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 gets the nod here with its 8.3 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 or HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++ share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and HERA Hera Black Cushion SPF34 PA++?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
More comparisons
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.