Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 vs EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.3/9.8 vs EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 at 6.3/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for hydration.
Head to head
Score comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Dr. Jart+ WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Jart+ WINSIngredient Transparency
Dr. Jart+ WINSFormulation Safety
EltaMD WINSIngredient face-off
25% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30
15 unique
Only in EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46
11 unique
Why Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 comes out ahead
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.9 compared to EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46's 4.7. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Panthenol in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 6.3 here versus 4.3 for EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while eltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 relies on Niacinamide, Tocopheryl Acetate, and Lactic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 sits at the mid-range level with a 6.3 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Our verdict
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 or EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 and EltaMD UV Clear Broad-Spectrum SPF 46?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
More comparisons
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.