Loading...
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores 8.5/9.8 vs SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule at 8.0/9.8. Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream wins for hydration.
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
6 unique
9 in common
13 unique
Where Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.7 compared to SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule's 7.8. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Sodium Hyaluronate in its top ingredients, Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores 8.8 here versus 7.5 for SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Ceramide Np as actives, while sKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Allantoin, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule is better if you have
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream is better if you have
Both sit in the budget bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream gets the nod here with its 8.5 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Ampoule is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.