Loading...
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 and Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores 8.5/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
25 unique
6 in common
16 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores 8.8 here versus 8.5 for Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Ceramide Np as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum relies on Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is a decent pick. Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream sits at the budget level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Torriden DIVE-IN Low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.