Loading...
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 and Torriden Cellmazing Bifida Anti-Wrinkle Cream scores 8.2/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
24 unique
7 in common
19 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Torriden Cellmazing Bifida Anti-Wrinkle Cream scores 6.9 here versus 4.3 for Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum brings Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18 as actives, while torriden Cellmazing Bifida Anti-Wrinkle Cream relies on Bifida Ferment Lysate, Niacinamide, and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
Torriden Cellmazing Bifida Anti-Wrinkle Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum delivers strong value. Torriden Cellmazing Bifida Anti-Wrinkle Cream sits at the mid-range level with a 8.2 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.