Loading...
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 and Some By Mi AHA BHA PHA 30 Days Miracle Serum scores 8.2/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
28 unique
19 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Some By Mi AHA BHA PHA 30 Days Miracle Serum scores 6.6 here versus 4.3 for Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum brings Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18 as actives, while some By Mi AHA BHA PHA 30 Days Miracle Serum relies on Niacinamide, Melaleuca Alternifolia (Tea Tree) Leaf Water, and Glycolic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
Some By Mi AHA BHA PHA 30 Days Miracle Serum is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.3, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum delivers strong value. Some By Mi AHA BHA PHA 30 Days Miracle Serum sits at the budget level with a 8.2 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.