Loading...
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.9/9.8 vs SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream at 8.0/9.8. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins for active ingredients.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
41 unique
6 in common
13 unique
Where Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.1 compared to SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream's 4.8. Its formula features Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 9.8 here versus 8.4 for SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate as actives, while sKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Madecassoside, and Asiaticoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.9, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment delivers strong value. SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream sits at the budget level with a 8.0 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Soothing Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.