Loading...
OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide scores 8.3/9.8 and Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
31 unique
6 in common
25 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 9.8 here versus 8.6 for OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide brings Lactobacillus Ferment, Niacinamide, and Tocopherol as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum relies on Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide is better if you have
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide gets the nod here with its 8.3 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, OLEHENRIKSEN Barrier Booster Vitamin C Milky Toner Essence with Niacinamide scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.