Loading...
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 8.2/9.8 and Purito Dermide Cica Barrier Sleeping Pack scores 8.3/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
24 unique
7 in common
16 unique
These two masks take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Purito Dermide Cica Barrier Sleeping Pack brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Madecassoside, and Asiaticoside as actives, while medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have
Purito Dermide Cica Barrier Sleeping Pack is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.2, Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is a decent pick. Purito Dermide Cica Barrier Sleeping Pack sits at the budget level with a 8.3 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Purito Dermide Cica Barrier Sleeping Pack scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.