innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule vs SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores 8.9/9.8 vs innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule at 8.5/9.8. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Retinol Cica Ampoule
Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
Score comparison
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
28% overlapOnly in innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule
7 unique
Shared ingredients
17 in common
Only in SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
43 unique
Why SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule comes out ahead
Where SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.6 compared to innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule's 6.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Hydrolyzed Silk, and Adenosine in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores 9.8 here versus 9.2 for innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Hydrolyzed Silk, and Adenosine as actives, while innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule relies on Niacinamide, Tocopherol, and Retinol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
At budget pricing with a score of 8.5, innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is a decent pick. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule sits at the mid-range level with a 8.9 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Our verdict
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule or SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
Based on ingredient analysis, SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.