innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule vs numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet scores 8.8/9.8 vs innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule at 8.5/9.8. numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Retinol Cica Ampoule
No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet
Score comparison
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet edges ahead, winning 1 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
innisfree WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
numbuzin WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
21% overlapOnly in innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule
10 unique
Shared ingredients
14 in common
Only in numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet
52 unique
Why numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet comes out ahead
Where numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule's 6.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Arginine, and Adenosine in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule scores 9.2 here versus 8.7 for numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet brings Niacinamide, Arginine, and Adenosine as actives, while innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule relies on Niacinamide, Tocopherol, and Retinol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Dipropylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
Both sit in the budget bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet gets the nod here with its 8.8 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule or numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet?
Based on ingredient analysis, numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Full Face Pack Sheet?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.