Loading...
Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dew Drops scores 8.2/9.8 and Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores 8.3/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
16 unique
7 in common
24 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dew Drops scores 4.7 here versus 4.3 for Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum brings Saccharomyces Lysate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18 as actives, while glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dew Drops relies on Niacinamide, Citrullus Lanatus (Watermelon) Fruit Extract, and Moringa Pterygosperma Seed Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dew Drops is better if you have
Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.2, Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dew Drops is a decent pick. Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum sits at the premium level with a 8.3 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Peter Thomas Roth Peptide Skinjection™ Amplified Wrinkle-Fix Refillable Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.