Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum vs Rhode Barrier Restore Cream
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream scores 8.5/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum at 8.0/9.8. Rhode Barrier Restore Cream wins for hydration.
Loading...
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream scores 8.5/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum at 8.0/9.8. Rhode Barrier Restore Cream wins for hydration.
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
10 unique
7 in common
16 unique
Where Rhode Barrier Restore Cream really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.0 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum's 6.2. With Glycerin, Phytosphingosine, and Cholesterol in its top ingredients, Rhode Barrier Restore Cream delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum scores 7.9 here versus 6.4 for Rhode Barrier Restore Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream brings Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum is better if you have
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.0, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum is a decent pick. Rhode Barrier Restore Cream sits at the mid-range level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Rhode Barrier Restore Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Rhode Barrier Restore Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.