Loading...
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging scores 9.4/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum at 8.3/9.8. IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging wins for hydration.
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
7 unique
10 in common
17 unique
Where IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.3 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum's 6.2. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Dipropylene Glycol in its top ingredients, IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum scores 7.9 here versus 5.9 for IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Asiaticoside as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum is better if you have
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging gets the nod here with its 9.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.