Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs OLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles at 8.2/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
17 unique
5 in common
32 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.8 compared to OLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles's 4.6. Its formula features Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. OLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles scores 8.8 here versus 8.0 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream brings Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside as actives, while oLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles relies on Retinol, Beta-Carotene, and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream is better if you have
OLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream gets the nod here with its 8.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but OLEHENRIKSEN Double Rewind Pro-Grade 0.3% Retinol for Fine Lines & Wrinkles is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.