Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 8.5/9.8 and INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum scores 8.6/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
22 unique
5 in common
47 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 7.2 here versus 6.1 for INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum brings Arginine, Lactic Acid, and Salix Alba (Willow) Bark Extract as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment is better if you have
INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment is a decent pick. INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum sits at the premium level with a 8.6 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pore Refine Pore Shrinking & Texture Smoothing Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.