Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 8.5/9.8 and Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer scores 8.7/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
21 unique
6 in common
48 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 8.3 here versus 7.0 for Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer brings Nymphaea Alba Root Extract, Copper Palmitoyl Heptapeptide-14, and Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7 as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment is better if you have
Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment is a decent pick. Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer sits at the premium level with a 8.7 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Drunk Elephant Protini Polypeptide Firming Refillable Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.