Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 vs SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
12 unique
8 in common
34 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.3 compared to SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream's 4.1. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream scores 9.6 here versus 8.9 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while sK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream relies on Niacinamide, Tocopheryl Acetate, and Chlorella Vulgaris Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.4, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream sits at the luxury level with a 8.1 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but SK-II R.N.A. Power Anti-Aging Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.