Loading...
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.9/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 at 8.4/9.8. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment wins for formulation safety.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
14 unique
6 in common
41 unique
Where Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment really shines is formulation safety, scoring 9.0 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30's 8.0.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 9.8 here versus 8.9 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, and Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.4, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is a decent pick. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment sits at the mid-range level with a 8.9 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.