Loading...
Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum scores 9.0/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 at 8.4/9.8. Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum wins for active ingredients.
Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
14 unique
6 in common
36 unique
Where Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.8 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30's 6.3. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester, and Adenosine in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester, and Adenosine as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum gets the nod here with its 9.0 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Kiehl's Retinol Skin-Renewing Daily Micro-Dose Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.