Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 and INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pro C Serum Brightening Solution with 15% Vitamin C + Ferulic Acid scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
15 unique
32 unique
These two spfs take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.9 here versus 5.8 for INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pro C Serum Brightening Solution with 15% Vitamin C + Ferulic Acid. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while iNNBEAUTY PROJECT Pro C Serum Brightening Solution with 15% Vitamin C + Ferulic Acid relies on Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, Niacinamide, and Ascorbic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
INNBEAUTY PROJECT Pro C Serum Brightening Solution with 15% Vitamin C + Ferulic Acid is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 gets the nod here with its 8.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.