Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores 8.4/9.8 and Glow Recipe Vitamin C Brightening Korean Guava Toner Pads for Undereye & Cheeks scores 8.2/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
16 unique
27 unique
These two spfs take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Glow Recipe Vitamin C Brightening Korean Guava Toner Pads for Undereye & Cheeks scores 7.3 here versus 6.3 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside as actives, while glow Recipe Vitamin C Brightening Korean Guava Toner Pads for Undereye & Cheeks relies on Gluconolactone, Lactic Acid, and Mandelic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
Glow Recipe Vitamin C Brightening Korean Guava Toner Pads for Undereye & Cheeks is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.4, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 delivers strong value. Glow Recipe Vitamin C Brightening Korean Guava Toner Pads for Undereye & Cheeks sits at the mid-range level with a 8.2 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.