Loading...
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores 8.6/9.8 and Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 8.6/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
56 unique
7 in common
15 unique
These two eye-cares take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 7.8 here versus 7.2 for CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides brings Hypnea Musciformis (Algae) Extract, Gelidiella Acerosa Extract, and Laminaria Digitata Extract as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides gets the nod here with its 8.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.