cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion at 8.2/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream wins for active ingredients.
Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion at 8.2/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
16 unique
7 in common
15 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.8 compared to cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion's 6.4. Its formula features Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores 8.0 here versus 7.5 for cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream brings Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside as actives, while cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion relies on Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.2, cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is a decent pick. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream sits at the premium level with a 8.6 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.