Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 8.5/9.8 vs cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion at 8.2/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment wins for hydration.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
17 unique
6 in common
21 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.3 compared to cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion's 7.5. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Sodium Hyaluronate in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores 7.2 here versus 6.4 for cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment brings Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside as actives, while cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion relies on Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.2, cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is a decent pick. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment sits at the mid-range level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but cerave PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.