Loading...
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 8.6/9.8 and Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule scores 8.7/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
20 unique
16 in common
8 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 9.8 here versus 9.2 for Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Tocopherol, and Retinol as actives, while biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule relies on Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule is better if you have
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is better if you have
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule comes in at budget pricing with a 8.7 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.