Loading...
Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches scores 8.3/9.8 and Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum scores 8.3/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
30 unique
7 in common
10 unique
These two eye-cares take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches scores 7.8 here versus 6.2 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches brings Allantoin, Niacinamide, and Adenosine as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum relies on Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.3, Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches is a decent pick. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Re.Pair Serum sits at the premium level with a 8.3 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Augustinus Bader The Eye Patches scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.