Loading...
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum scores 8.8/9.8 vs Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 at 8.4/9.8. Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum wins for active ingredients.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
31 unique
8 in common
12 unique
Where Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 8.5 compared to Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30's 6.3. Its formula features Niacinamide, Tranexamic Acid, and Alpha-Arbutin in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum brings Niacinamide, Tranexamic Acid, and Alpha-Arbutin as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 relies on Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Madecassoside. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum is better if you have
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.8, Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum delivers strong value. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 sits at the premium level with a 8.4 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF30 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.