Loading...
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores 7.3/9.8 and Sence Lip Balm Coconut scores 7.3/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
34 unique
12 unique
These two lip-cares take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores 3.6 here versus 2.0 for Sence Lip Balm Coconut. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask brings Dipalmitoyl Hydroxyproline, Tocopherol, and Lactic Acid as actives, while sence Lip Balm Coconut relies on Tocopheryl Acetate, Piroctone Olamine, and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask is better if you have
Sence Lip Balm Coconut is better if you have
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask comes in at mid-range pricing with a 7.3 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.