Loading...
Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 scores 8.2/9.8 vs SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 at 6.4/9.8. Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 wins for active ingredients.
Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
19 unique
12 unique
Where Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 7.0 compared to SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30's 3.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Asiaticoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 scores 7.5 here versus 4.6 for SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 brings Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica Extract, and Asiaticoside as actives, while sOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 relies on Niacinamide, Ectoin, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 is better if you have
SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.2, Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 delivers strong value. SOFIE PAVITT FACE Screentime Non-Comedogenic Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 30 sits at the mid-range level with a 6.4 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, Purito Centella Green Level Unscented Sun SPF 50 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.