Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment vs SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.7/9.8 and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores 8.9/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
TIEIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
SUNGBOON EDITOR WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
17% overlapOnly in Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
37 unique
Shared ingredients
10 in common
Only in SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule
50 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Hydrolyzed Silk, and Adenosine as actives, while paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment relies on Retinol, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, and Palmitoyl Oligopeptide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Retinol does the heavy lifting
SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule gets the nod here with its 8.9 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment or SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
Based on ingredient analysis, SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment and SUNGBOON EDITOR Silk Peptide EGF Heart Fit Volume Lifting Ampoule?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.