OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask vs Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control
OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask scores 8.9/9.8 vs Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control at 7.0/9.8. OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask
Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control
Score comparison
OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
TIEIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
OLEHENRIKSEN WINSIngredient Transparency
OLEHENRIKSEN WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
16% overlapOnly in OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask
26 unique
Shared ingredients
5 in common
Only in Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control
13 unique
Why OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask comes out ahead
Where OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.4 compared to Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control's 2.0. Its formula features Gluconolactone, Glycolic Acid, and Lactic Acid in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask scores 8.5 here versus 7.5 for Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask brings Gluconolactone, Glycolic Acid, and Lactic Acid as actives, giving it an edge in targeted skincare benefits.
Best for your skin type
OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Propylene Glycol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask gets the nod here with its 8.9 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask or Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control?
Based on ingredient analysis, OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask and Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between OLEHENRIKSEN Dewtopia 25% AHA + PHA Flash Facial Exfoliating Face Mask and Peter Thomas Roth Even Clearer™ Therapeutic Sulfur Acne Mask for Pores and Oil Control?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.