Gracie

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 vs Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 8.4/9.8 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.

Head to head

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0
medicube

Zero Pore Pad 2.0

exfoliantmid-range
8.4
VS
Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen
Tower 28 Beauty

SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen

spf
8.4

Score comparison

These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.

1
3
1
medicube wins 1
Tied 3
Tower 28 Beauty wins 1
8.4medicube
vs
8.4Tower 28 Beauty

Scores last verified: July 2026

Attribute battle

Hydration Efficacy

Tower 28 Beauty WINS
7.4
9.8
medicube
Tower 28 Beauty

Irritation Risk

TIE
9.5
9.5
medicube
Tower 28 Beauty

Active Ingredient Strength

TIE
6.3
6.0
medicube
Tower 28 Beauty

Ingredient Transparency

medicube WINS
8.8
8.5
medicube
Tower 28 Beauty

Formulation Safety

TIE
9.0
9.0
medicube
Tower 28 Beauty

Why these two are neck and neck

These two exfoliants take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.

Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 8.8 here versus 8.5 for Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone as actives, while tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen relies on Allantoin, Bisabolol, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.

Best for your skin type

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have

  • Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
  • Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
  • Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen is better if you have

  • Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
  • Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Cholesterol
  • Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Value comparison

medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 comes in at mid-range pricing with a 8.4 score, which is solid value at that tier.

Our verdict

✶ Our verdict

It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.

8.4medicube
vs
8.4Tower 28 Beauty

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 or Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen?

Based on ingredient analysis, medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.

Do medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen share ingredients?

Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.

What's the main difference between medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 and Tower 28 Beauty SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen?

The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.