Loading...
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer scores 8.5/9.8 vs Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream at 8.1/9.8. La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
19 unique
10 in common
17 unique
Where La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.8 compared to Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream's 5.2. Its formula features Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Tocopherol in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Tocopherol as actives, while su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream relies on Bifida Ferment Lysate, Adenosine, and Niacinamide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer is better if you have
Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer delivers strong value. Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream sits at the luxury level with a 8.1 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.