Loading...
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores 7.3/9.8 vs Kiehl's Since 1851 Buttermask Intense Repair Lip Treatment at 5.9/9.8. rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask wins for hydration.
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask takes this one, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
15 unique
4 in common
34 unique
Where rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 6.2 compared to Kiehl's Since 1851 Buttermask Intense Repair Lip Treatment's 2.6. With Polybutene, Sodium Hyaluronate, and Synthetic Beeswax in its top ingredients, rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores 3.6 here versus 2.0 for Kiehl's Since 1851 Buttermask Intense Repair Lip Treatment. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask brings Dipalmitoyl Hydroxyproline, Tocopherol, and Lactic Acid as actives, while kiehl's Since 1851 Buttermask Intense Repair Lip Treatment relies on Tocopherol, Vanilla Planifolia Fruit Extract, and Stevia Rebaudiana Leaf/Stem Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Kiehl's Since 1851 Buttermask Intense Repair Lip Treatment is better if you have
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask gets the nod here with its 7.3 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, rhode Peptide Lip Boost Plumping Lip Mask scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.