innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask vs Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer
innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask scores 8.9/9.8 vs Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer at 6.6/9.8. innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask
Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer
Score comparison
innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
innisfree WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
innisfree WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
10% overlapOnly in innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask
35 unique
Only in Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer
18 unique
Why innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask comes out ahead
Where innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.7 compared to Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer's 2.7. Its formula features Niacinamide, Glycolic Acid, and Lactic Acid in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask scores 7.4 here versus 4.9 for Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask brings Niacinamide, Glycolic Acid, and Lactic Acid as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer relies on Lactobacillus/Pumpkin Fruit Ferment Filtrate, Ascorbic Acid, and Tocopheryl Acetate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.9, innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask delivers strong value. Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer sits at the premium level with a 6.6 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Our verdict
innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask or Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer?
Based on ingredient analysis, innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask and Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between innisfree Volcanic Swirl Exfoliating Pore Mask and Peter Thomas Roth Pumpkin Enzyme Mask Enzymatic Dermal Resurfacer?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.