Loading...
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 8.8/9.8 vs innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging at 8.5/9.8. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel wins for active ingredients.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
21 unique
7 in common
Where Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging's 4.5. Its formula features Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 9.8 here versus 7.0 for innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging is better if you have
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging is a decent pick. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel sits at the premium level with a 8.8 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but innisfree Retinol Green Tea PDRN™ Korean Firming & Smoothing Serum for Slow-Aging is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.