Loading...
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule scores 8.7/9.8 vs Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 at 8.2/9.8. Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule wins for hydration.
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule edges ahead, winning 1 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
12 unique
12 in common
19 unique
Where Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.2 compared to Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0's 7.4. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Pentylene Glycol in its top ingredients, Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Tocopherol, and Retinol as actives, while medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule is better if you have
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.7, Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule delivers strong value. Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 sits at the mid-range level with a 8.2 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Innisfree Retinol Cica Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.