Loading...
Heimish Bulgarian Rose Water Hydrogel Eye Patch scores 8.0/9.8 and Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream scores 8.1/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
30 unique
10 in common
17 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream brings Bifida Ferment Lysate, Adenosine, and Niacinamide as actives, while heimish Bulgarian Rose Water Hydrogel Eye Patch relies on Niacinamide, Cocos Nucifera Fruit Extract, and Nelumbo Nucifera Flower Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Heimish Bulgarian Rose Water Hydrogel Eye Patch is better if you have
Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is better if you have
At budget pricing with a score of 8.0, Heimish Bulgarian Rose Water Hydrogel Eye Patch is a decent pick. Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream sits at the luxury level with a 8.1 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.