Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles vs The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness
Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles scores 8.5/9.8 and The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness scores 8.5/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles
Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
The Ordinary WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Fig.1 WINSIngredient Transparency
Fig.1 WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
11% overlapOnly in Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles
29 unique
Only in The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness
40 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two eye-cares take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness scores 9.8 here versus 8.7 for Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles brings Ceramide Np, Retinyl Palmitate, and Tocopherol as actives, while the Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness relies on Ectoin, Allantoin, and Lysine Hcl. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Hydrogenated Lecithin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles is a decent pick. The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness sits at the budget level with a 8.5 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles or The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness?
Based on ingredient analysis, Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles and The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles and The Ordinary Rice Lipids + Ectoin Microemulsion Moisturizer for Soothing Hydration & Reduced Redness?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.