Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles vs Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles scores 8.5/9.8 and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.7/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles
Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Paula's Choice WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Paula's Choice WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
13% overlapOnly in Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles
28 unique
Shared ingredients
6 in common
Only in Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
41 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 9.8 here versus 8.7 for Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, and Palmitoyl Oligopeptide as actives, while fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles relies on Ceramide Np, Retinyl Palmitate, and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Retinol does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment gets the nod here with its 8.7 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles or Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment?
Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Fig.1 Pro-Retinol Refillable Eye Cream for Fine Lines and Dark Circles and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.