Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind vs Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind scores 8.5/9.8 and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind
KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
15% overlapOnly in Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind
35 unique
Shared ingredients
6 in common
Only in Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
15 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two toners take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind scores 5.6 here versus 5.0 for Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind brings Niacinamide, Pyrus Malus (Apple) Fruit Extract, and Zinc Pca as actives, while kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum relies on Nicotiana Benthamiana Hexapeptide-40 Sh-Polypeptide-2, Zingiber Officinale (Ginger) Root Extract, and Bisabolol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Propanediol
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.5, Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind delivers strong value. Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum sits at the luxury level with a 8.4 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind or Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum?
Based on ingredient analysis, Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Fenty Beauty by Rihanna Fat Water Hydrating Milky Toner Essence with Hyaluronic Acid + Tamarind and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.