Loading...
Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme scores 8.2/9.8 and Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream scores 8.1/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
49 unique
10 in common
15 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme brings Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract, Laminaria Digitata Extract, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream relies on Ceramide Np, Allantoin, and Tocopheryl Acetate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme is better if you have
Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream is better if you have
At luxury pricing with a score of 8.2, Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme delivers strong value. Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream sits at the premium level with a 8.1 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Estée Lauder Resilience Multi-Effect Tri-Peptide Face and Neck Creme scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.