Loading...
Drunk Elephant TLC Sukari Babyfacial 25% AHA/ 2% BHA Exfoliating Mask scores 9.2/9.8 and IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging scores 9.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
28 unique
7 in common
20 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Drunk Elephant TLC Sukari Babyfacial 25% AHA/ 2% BHA Exfoliating Mask scores 7.0 here versus 5.9 for IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Asiaticoside as actives, while drunk Elephant TLC Sukari Babyfacial 25% AHA/ 2% BHA Exfoliating Mask relies on Glycolic Acid, Salicylic Acid, and Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Drunk Elephant TLC Sukari Babyfacial 25% AHA/ 2% BHA Exfoliating Mask is better if you have
IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging is better if you have
At luxury pricing with a score of 9.2, Drunk Elephant TLC Sukari Babyfacial 25% AHA/ 2% BHA Exfoliating Mask is a decent pick. IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging sits at the premium level with a 9.4 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, IOPE XMD Stem III Clinical Recovery Serum PDRN Skincare for Anti-Aging scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.