Loading...
Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum scores 8.5/9.8 vs Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream at 8.1/9.8. Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum wins for hydration.
Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
20 unique
12 in common
29 unique
Where Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.3 compared to Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream's 8.0. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Pentylene Glycol in its top ingredients, Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum scores 5.8 here versus 5.4 for Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum brings Opuntia Ficus-Indica Stem Extract, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, and Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7 as actives, while drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream relies on Plantago Lanceolata Leaf Extract, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream is better if you have
Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.1, Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream is a decent pick. Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum sits at the mid-range level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Drunk Elephant Lala Retro Whipped Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Youth to the People Triple Peptide + Cactus Oasis Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.